Both the manager and the players were furious… Watching the video reading ‘roughly’ and ‘returning’ Why is this like this 

 Controversy arose again in the Korean Air vs Hyundai Capital match.

Dodram 2022-2023 V-League men’s Korean Air and Hyundai Capital’s 4th round confrontation held at Incheon Gyeyang Gymnasium on the 7th. As a result, Korean Air won the set score 3-2 (19-25, 26-24, 25-22, 25-27, 15-12), and controversy arose over the match committee’s insincere video review and replay.

After the game, coach Choi Tae-woong, who lost, said, “If we had won today, men’s volleyball would have been more fun, but it’s a pity.” are called regulations. However, the part that said that the video reading could not be corrected must be communicated to each team.” 메이저놀이터

In the second set, there was a video reading controversy. In the fight for first and second place, the players compete fiercely on the court, but the match committee did a rough reading of the video. Moreover, it was repeated over and over again.

In the second set, Hyundai Capital and Korean Air faced off 23-23. Heo Soo-bong of Hyundai Capital delivered a powerful spike serve.

Korean Air Libero Park Ji-hoon received it, setter Han raised the ball, and Lincoln succeeded in attacking. At this time, I applied for a video review at Hyundai Capital Bench.

The problem was that Eui-tak Chung, a member of the competition committee, made the decision after seeing only the screen that caught the scene in the air. Korean Air’s Fohitra accepted Hyundai Capital’s argument.

Then, the Korean Air players felt unfair and protested, “How do you read it by looking at just one screen?” Because of this, the referee also said, “Look at several screens and read it again.”

Commissioner Jeong watched the scene additionally and eventually redone it. Hyundai Capital said, “The judgment cannot be corrected,” and asked, “Why are you correcting it this time?”

Players run fiercely from round 1 to round 6 with the goal of winning. The sweat drops of the players are rewarded with the results of the game. However, the referee and competition committee are pouring cold water on their enthusiasm.

During the video review process, Jeong Eui-tak, who made a rough decision after seeing only one screen, was punished by excluding three games due to a video review error in the men’s match between KB Insurance and KEPCO on December 27 last year.

Managers and players of both teams, as well as fans, shouted at the insincere manner of a match committee member. A fair and sincere operation is required.

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *